On the Word as the Gathering of Being
Quaeritur
Utrum Logos divinus, qui in principio erat apud Deum et per quem omnia facta sunt, intelligi debeat ut principium congregationis entium, an potius ut nomen metaphoricum pro ordine naturae et cohaerentia rationali rerum.
It is asked whether the divine Logos, who in the beginning was with God and through whom all things were made, should be understood as the true principle of the gathering of beings, or merely as a metaphor for the rational order and coherence of things.
Thesis
The Logos is not a symbol of rational order but is its ontological source. All beings cohere because they are gathered into intelligibility by the eternal Word. This gathering (synagōgē) is not an external arrangement but is rather an interior constitution: Each thing is what it is by participation in the unifying act of the Logos. Therefore, the world that worlds does so only because the Word that words gathers it into being. In principio erat Verbum, and in that beginning every multiplicity is reconciled.
Locus Classicus
“In ipso omnia constant.” — Colossians 1:17
(“In him all things hold together.”)
Heraclitus called the Logos the hidden harmony that orders all things (frag. 50). Heidegger, in Einführung in die Metaphysik, recovered this ancient sense of logos as synagōgē. It is the gathering that lets beings appear together as a world. John’s Gospel further declares that the Logos who gathers all things is not an abstraction but a Person: the eternal Son through whom being itself becomes communicative.
Explicatio
The Greek logos first meant “to gather, to collect.” Before it meant “speech,” it signified the unity that draws together the many. Heraclitus saw that without this hidden gathering there would be no world, only flux. Yet the gathering he perceived remained impersonal: order without love.
In the fullness of revelation, the logos of the philosophers becomes the Logos of God. He is not merely the principle of intelligibility but its living act: the Word who both speaks and is what is spoken. Through Him, the multiplicity of beings is not dissolved but harmonized and diversity becomes communion.
Heidegger’s logos as synagōgē recognizes that language gathers beings into presence. But the later Heidegger stopped at the threshold: the logos for him discloses Being but is not itself personal. Theology completes the movement. The gathering of being is not an event of language alone but the act of the divine Word through whom all being is spoken.
Hence, to say the Word gathers being is not metaphor but metaphysics.
Every act of understanding, every law of nature, every relation of love, is a mode of this gathering. What philosophy glimpsed as coherence, theology confesses as communion: the world is not simply ordered; it is embraced.
Obiectiones
Obj. I. Naturalism supposes that the unity of the world arises from physical laws and causal regularities, and the Logos adds nothing to this explanation. It merely personifies the intelligibility of nature.
Obj. II. Heidegger affirms in section VII of Sein und Zeit that the Logos is the gathering of language itself. However, he also assumes that to identify it with a divine subject is to return to onto-theology and suppress the openness of Being.
Obj. III. Nominalism asserts that only individual things exist, and thus the idea of a unifying Logos is an abstraction derived from linguistic convenience.
Obj. IV. Idealism holds that the world’s unity lies in the activity of the human mind. Accordingly, the Logos is merely a projection of finite reason upon the whole.
Obj. V. The Trinitarian skeptic declares that if the Logos is a personal hypostasis, distinct yet divine, then theology would risk positing two gods, one who gathers and one who is gathered.
Responsiones
Ad I. Physical law explains order only by presupposing the intelligibility of being. To speak of law is already to invoke Logos. The personification is not addition but recognition: the world’s rationality is the trace of a rational Word.
Ad II. Heidegger rightly saw the logos as the gathering of being but mistook impersonal disclosure for final truth. The openness of Being is itself the echo of the divine act that gives it; the Logos does not close openness but grounds it.
Ad III. Nominalism mistakes the plurality of names for the plurality of realities. That things are nameable and coherent already presupposes the gathering unity of meaning, the very act of the Logos.
Ad IV. Idealism confuses participation with projection.
Human reason can unify experience only because it is itself gathered by the divine reason that constitutes all intelligibility.
Ad V. In the Trinity there is no dualism but procession: the Father gathers in the Son, and the Son gathers all in the Spirit.
The gathering of being is one act in three relations, the unity of love.
Nota
The Logos synagōgē is not a poetic metaphor nor a mere philosophical category but a theological disclosure. The world’s intelligibility is the mode of its dependence. What Heraclitus and Heidegger called the “gathering” is, in Christian confession, the personal act of the Son through whom all things subsist. This doctrine rescues metaphysics from abstraction and returns it to communion.
To say that the Word gathers being is to affirm that intelligibility is love, that to be known and to be are one act in the divine. Thus, ontology and revelation coincide: esse itself is the Word’s embrace.
DETERMINATIO
From the foregoing it is determined that:
The Logos is the ontological source of all gathering; the coherence of beings is participation in His unifying act.
The philosophical notion of logos as rational order finds its fulfillment, not negation, in the personal Word of God.
The intelligibility of the world is therefore a mode of divine presence; Being is communicative because it is spoken.
The Heideggerian “gathering of language” is true but incomplete; it must be transfigured into a theology of the Word who both speaks and is.
Hence, the world that worlds does so only because the Word that words gathers it into being.
Therefore we conclude: Verbum est congregatio entis; et esse est sermo Verbi. The Word is the gathering of being, and being itself is the speech of the Word.
Transitus ad Disputationem XXXV
If the Logos gathers beings into unity, He also gathers thought itself, for reason is one mode of being’s participation in the Word. Philosophy has long sought this gathering through its own dialectic, from Kant to Hegel, yet without recognizing the personal Logos who grounds it.
Thus we proceed to Disputatio XXXV: De Ontologia Idealistica et Theologia Logi, in which we inquire as to how the movement of German Idealism—its striving toward absolute reason—finds its true resolution not in self-consciousness, but in the divine Logos who is both the ground and goal of all intelligibility.
No comments:
Post a Comment