On Special Providence and Revelation in Particular Events
Quaeritur
Utrum providentia specialis designet modum quo voluntas divina manifestatur in eventibus particularibus, ita ut eventus isti non sint merae contingentiae temporales sed loci in quibus Logos intentionaliter agit; et quomodo haec particularis manifestatio non confundat causam divinam et creatam nec redigat revelationem ad interpretationem humanam.
Whether special providence designates the mode by which the divine will manifests itself in particular events, such that these events are not mere temporal contingencies but loci where the Logos intentionally acts; and how such particular manifestation neither confuses divine and creaturely causality nor reduces revelation to human interpretation.
Thesis
Special providence is the enactment of divine intention within determinate historical events. It is not an intrusion upon natural processes nor an alternative causal chain. It is the Logos’ intentional ordering of specific occurrences so that they bear the form of divine act. Such events become revelatory when the Spirit illumines them as manifestations of divine purpose.
Special providence does not violate creaturely freedom, for it operates at the level of constitutive intelligibility, not at the level of coercive determination. Nor does it collapse into general providence, for it concerns the particular specification of divine agency within concrete history. Thus special providence is the personal articulation of divine intention within the temporal order.
Locus Classicus
Genesis 50:20
Vos cogitastis de me malum, Deus autem cogitavit in bonum.
“You meant evil against me, but God meant it for good.”
A single event bears two intentions without competition.
Acts 17:26–27
ἐποίησέν τε ἐξ ἑνὸς πᾶν ἔθνος ἀνθρώπων κατοικεῖν ἐπὶ παντὸς προσώπου τῆς γῆς,
ὁρίσας προστεταγμένους καιροὺς καὶ τὰς ὁροθεσίας τῆς κατοικίας αὐτῶν,
ζητεῖν τὸν Θεόν, εἰ ἄρα γε ψηλαφήσειαν αὐτὸν καὶ εὕροιεν,
καί γε οὐ μακρὰν ἀπὸ ἑνὸς ἑκάστου ἡμῶν ὑπάρχοντα.
"He made from one every nation of humankind to dwell on all the face of the earth, having determined their appointed times and the boundaries of their habitation, that they would seek God."
Luther, WA 10 III, 35
Deus gubernat omnia non solum in universali, sed in particulari.
“God governs all things not only in general but in particular.”
Explicatio
1. Special providence is not a narrower form of general providence
General providence concerns the constitutive order of all things: the intelligibility of history and the sustaining power of the Logos. Special providence concerns the specific articulation of divine intention within determinate events. To use an image: general providence is the grammar of history; special providence is the sentence God speaks within it. Thus, special providence is not a separate kind of causation but a more determinate mode of divine intentionality operating within the field general providence provides.
2. A particular event becomes revelatory when illumined
Every event possesses its own creaturely causal history. Special providence does not abolish this but brings it into relation with divine intentionality. An event becomes revelatory not because a different kind of cause appears but because the Spirit grants the event to be perceived according to its deeper meaning in the Logos. Thus revelation is not a doubling of events but an unveiling of the intention that grounds them. Accordingly, the Red Sea crossing, the call of Abraham, the Damascus road encounter: each is a historical occurrence whose revelatory character derives from divine intentionality perceived under illumination.
3. Special providence does not negate creaturely agency
A single event can bear both divine and creaturely intentions without contradiction because:
• divine intention grounds the event’s being and meaning,
• creaturely intention grounds its moral and temporal content.
Joseph’s brothers intend evil. God intends good. These intentions coexist because divine intentionality does not operate on the same causal register as creaturely intention. God does not coerce their act; he situates its meaning within the broader narrative of salvation.This is neither compatibilism nor libertarianism, but enjoins a participatory causality.
4. Special providence is intelligible only within a participatory ontology
If divine and creaturely causes occupy the same plane, special providence becomes indistinguishable from determinism or interventionism. But when the Logos is understood as the intelligible ground of all finite processes, special providence becomes the specification of divine intention within a concrete finite form. Thus natural and divine causes do not compete. Divine action sustains natural causality even as it uses it. Luther’s language of God working “in and under” events reflects this metaphysical layering.
5. Revelation arises from divine act, not human interpretation
Special providence does not depend on human judgment. An event is revelatory because God acts, not because humans discern divine action. Illumination grants recognition but does not constitute the divine act. Thus the subjectivism of purely hermeneutical or postliberal models is avoided. What God does is real even before it is recognized. Interpretation follows illumination; illumination follows divine intention; and divine intention grounds the event.
Objectiones
Ob I. If special providence identifies divine intention in particular events, how can one distinguish revelation from coincidence?
Ob II. If God intends specific events, does this not collapse creaturely freedom?
Ob III. If revelation arises from illumination, is it not subjective
Ob IV. If God orders particular events, is God then responsible for evil?
Ob V. Special providence seems indistinguishable from miracle. Are they the same?
Responsiones
Ad I. Coincidence is a name for events lacking perceived intelligibility. Special providence is the intentional grounding of events by the Logos. Recognition requires illumination, but the reality does not depend on recognition.
Ad II. Divine intention provides the possibility and meaning of the event, not the moral content of the creaturely act. Freedom determines intention; providence establishes context. One does not negate the other.
Ad III. Illumination grants the truth of revelation to be known. It does not create the truth. Revelation is objective in divine act and participatory in creaturely apprehension.
Ad IV. God sustains the event as event but does not intend the creature’s evil. Providence orders evil toward good without causing the evil itself. The defect arises from the creature; the ordering arises from God.
Ad V. Miracle suspends ordinary natural processes. Special providence works through them. Both reveal God; they differ in mode, not in reality of divine action.
Nota
Special providence is the concrete specification of divine intentionality in history. It is not occasionalism, for it preserves creaturely agency; nor is it deism, for it recognizes divine presence in every event. It reveals God as the one whose eternal will becomes manifest in time without violence to freedom or nature.
This is theological realism: God acts, and events bear the form of that act.
Determinatio
We determine:
Special providence is the particular manifestation of divine intention in concrete historical events.
It does not abolish creaturely causality but situates it within divine purpose. Revelation in specific events arises from the Logos’ ordering and the Spirit’s illumination. Thus special providence is neither determinism nor hermeneutic projection. It is divine action in the concrete.
Transitus ad Disputationem LXII
Having shown that divine intention becomes manifest in particular events, we now turn to the event in which divine intention and creaturely nature are united in the most intimate form: the incarnation. For Christ is not merely a revelatory event but the ontological union of God and man.
We therefore proceed to Disputatio LXII: De Communicatione Idiomatum et Ontologia Participationis.
No comments:
Post a Comment